Research Article

Endovascular treatment of complex cerebral arterial saccular aneurysms with different methods of coiling: 14 years of experience review

Dmytro V Scheglov*, Stanislav V Konotopchik, Maryna Y Mamonova and Oleg E Sviridyuk

Published: 21 June, 2017 | Volume 1 - Issue 1 | Pages: 005-019

The Objective: to improve the treatment results for patients with cerebral arterial saccular aneurysms by optimizing of differentiated approach to the using of endovascular assisting occlusion techniques.

Materials and Methods: The work is based on the comprehensive survey and treatment of 1345 patients with cerebral saccular arterial aneurysms (AA), who were treated at the SO “Scientific-Practical Center of endovascular neuroradiology of NAMS of Ukraine” from 2002 to 2016. 214 cases were selected for further clinical-instrumental dynamic observation in follow-up period. All patients were operated by endovascular approach in “before hemorrhage” period, in acute or “cold” period of the disease on for symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial saccular AA in both vascular pools with balloon-remodeling or stent-assisting techniques using with the coiling or just detachable coils (DC) using-mono-coils occlusion technique. Depending on the initial endovascular occlusion method, the patients were divided into three groups for observation: I group (mono-coils occlusion)-82 (38.3%) patients, II group (balloon-remodeling technique using)-68 (31.8%) patients, group III (stent-assisting technique occlusion)-64 (29.9%) patients. The life quality and the level of social adaptation were evaluated before hospital discharge and at the follow-up control examinations by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and by the modified Rankine scale (mRS). AA radicalism occlusion was assessed by Modified Raymond-Roy Scale (MRRS) (Mascitelli JR, et al., 2015). AA occlusion I and II by MRRS was considered as “Effective”.

Results: 9 criteria of cerebral saccular AA complexity inherent in endovascular surgery have been developed based on the technical and surgical features of endovascular methods of the cerebral AA occlusion and X-ray-anatomical characteristics of aneurysms, which complicated the “effective” reconstructive occlusion of AA cavity.

The evaluation of the AA complexity criteria prognostic significance to achieve the “effective” primary occlusion, shown different results in different groups: high prognostic significance of 4 criteria was shown in group I, of 2 criteria - in group III, and no any criteria significance in group II.

There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the primary AA occlusion efficacy and initial good results by GOS and mRS.

It was proved that endovascular occlusion of complex cerebral AA with the assisting methods using has high efficiency in all periods of the disease, unlike the method of mono-coils occlusion, which is most effective in acute and “cold” periods.

There was no statistically significant difference between the number of intraoperative, postoperative and non-surgical complications (p>0.05).

It was found that all methods of complex AA endovascular occlusion can effectively prevent the disease recurrence despite the differences between them in the stability of the AA cavity occlusion.

Conclusions: Consideration of developed AA complexity criteria during endovascular surgery planning allows to choose the most optimal and safe individual method of primary or phased AA occlusion and helps to reduce the frequency of AA recanalization in follow-up period. The choice of the complex AA occlusion method doesn’t effect on result of primary treatment, the number of intraoperative complications and the quality of primary occlusion. However, an analysis of the long-term treatment results indicates that the assisting techniques have proven advantages according to the occlusion stability.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.hacr.1001002 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF


Complexity cerebral arterial aneurysm; Aneurysm complexity criteria; Endovascular occlusion; Assisting methods; Radicalism of occlusion; Recanalization


  1. Krylov VV, Godkov DV. Cerebral aneurysm surgery. Editor Krylov VV, Moscow, Novoe Vremya. 2011; 1: 12-15.
  2. Choudhri O, Mukerji N. Combined endovascular and microsurgical management of complex cerebral aneurysms. Front Neurol. 2013; 4: 108-115. Ref.: https://goo.gl/T1xHdR
  3. Byrne JV, Guglielmi G. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. 1998; 248. Ref.: https://goo.gl/6c16Yc
  4. Shchehlov DV. Diagnostics and endovascular treatment of intracranial arterial aneurysms: author's abstract. Dis. For Dr. Med. Sciences. Neurosurgery, Kyiv, 2014; 13-27.
  5. Kandyba DV, Babichev KN, Savello AV. The role of assisting methods for intravascular occlusion of cerebral aneurysm. Circul Pathol Cardiac Surg. 2012; 3: 27-34.
  6. Hacein-Bey L, Connolly ES Jr, Mayer SA, Young WL, Pile-Spellman J, et al. Complex intracranial aneurysms: combined operative and endovascular approaches. Neurosurgery. 1998; 43: 1304-1312. Ref.: https://goo.gl/8LZ1BA
  7. Fandino J, Taussky P, Marbacher S, Muroi C, Diepers M, et al. The concept of a hybrid operating room: applications in cerebrovascular surgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2013; 115: 113-117. Ref.: https://goo.gl/R2NvTJ
  8. Murayama Y, Arakawa H, Ishibashi T, Kawamura D, Ebara M, et al. Combined surgical and endovascular treatment of complex cerebrovascular diseases in the hybrid operating room. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013; 1: 489-493. Ref.: https://goo.gl/hUCy4N
  9. Piotin M, Blanc R. Balloons and stents in the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms: vascular anatomy remodeled. Front Neurol. 2014; 5: 41-50. Ref.: https://goo.gl/zE96NL
  10. Hanel RA, Spetzler RF. Surgical treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2008; 62: 1289-1299. Ref.: https://goo.gl/uyhkqq
  11. Andaluz N, Zuccarello M. Treatment strategies for complex intracranial aneurysms: review of a 12-year experience university of cincinnati. Skull Base. 2011; 21: 233-242. Ref.: https://goo.gl/31KVJh
  12. Chitale R, Chalouhi N, Theofanis T, Starke RM, Amenta P, et al. Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: comparison of stenting and balloon remodeling. Neurosurgery. 2013; 72: 953-959. Ref.: https://goo.gl/cNypTX
  13. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, Georganos SA, Juravsky L, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1398-1403. Ref.: https://goo.gl/2KfkZC
  14. Roach MR. A model study of why some intracranial aneurysms thrombose but others rupture. Stroke. 1978; 9: 583-587. Ref.: https://goo.gl/ma4BMe
  15. Smith RL, Blick EF, Coalson J, Stein PD. Thrombus production by turbulence. J Appl Physiol. 1972; 32: 261-264. Ref.: https://goo.gl/WEG5pS
  16. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: Preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg. 1991; 75: 8-14. Ref.: https://goo.gl/PGuXkD
  17. Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A. Reconstruction technic in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. Long-term angiographic and clinical results. Apropos of 56 cases. J Neuroradiol. 1997; 24: 30-44. Ref.: https://goo.gl/ztpZ9X
  18. Van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Metz NH, Nijssen PC, Wijnalda D, et al. Carotid balloon occlusion for large and giant aneurysms: evaluation of a new test occlusion protocol. Neurosurgery. 2000; 47: 116-121. Ref.: https://goo.gl/43PyMZ
  19. Shcheglov VI. Endovascular occlusion of saccular intracranial aneurysms: Results in 617 patients, 27th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, Orlando, Florida, March 1989.
  20. Fox AJ, Vinuela F, Pelz DM, Peerless SJ, Ferguson GG, et al. Use of detachable balloons for proximal artery occlusion in the treatment of unclippable cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1987; 66: 40-46. Ref.: https://goo.gl/cmPQJj
  21. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Masaryk TJ, Rasmussen PA, McDougall CG. Balloon-in-stent technique for the constructive endovascular treatment of ultra wide-necked circumferential aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2005; 57: 1218-1227. Ref.: https://goo.gl/nPiQ6q
  22. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Roy D. Neck-bridge device for endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: initial experience. Radiology. 2001; 221: 318-326. Ref.: https://goo.gl/agbEc5
  23. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Sepetka I, Macellari V. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: Electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg. 1991; 75: 1-7. Ref.: https://goo.gl/56A1g7
  24. Kim M, Levy EI, Meng H, Hopkins LN. Quantification of hemodynamic changes induced by virtual placement of multiple stents across a wide-necked basilar trunk aneurysm. Neurosurgery. 2007; 61: 1305-1313. Ref.: https://goo.gl/sWd4hj


Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 1

Figure 3

Figure 1

Figure 4

Figure 1

Figure 5

Figure 1

Figure 6

Figure 1

Figure 7

Figure 1

Figure 8

Figure 1

Figure 9

Figure 1

Figure 10

Figure 1

Figure 11

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?